Search for: "Banks v. Fair"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2019, 7:16 am
White, Bank of America v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 1:59 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and Others Court of Appeal “The Office of Fair Trading was entitled to assess the fairness of charges levied on customers by banks because the terms in standard form contracts between banks and their customers concerning specific charges when customers were overdrawn were not part of the core [...] [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:33 am
New Article: Jesse Snyder, How Patent Law Keeps the Hope of Fair Housing Alive for All, Even After Bank of America Corporation v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 2:18 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and Others Supreme Court "Charges levied by banks on personal current account customers in respect of unauthorised overdrafts were part of a package of consideration for the package of banking services provided and accordingly their fairness was exempt from review by the Office of Fair Trading. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:49 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and others [2009] EWCA Civ 116; [2009] WLR (D) 69 “Terms in standard form contracts between bank and customer providing for relevant charges when a customer gave instructions for payment but had insufficient funds in his current account were not exempt from assessment as to fairness under reg [...] [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:15 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and Others Queen’s Bench Division “Terms in standard form contracts between bank and customer providing for relevant charges were not exempt from assessment as to fairness. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 8:38 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and Others [2008] EWHC 875 (Comm); [2008] WLR (D) 128 “Terms in standard form contracts between bank and customer providing for relevant charges were not exempt from assessment as to fairness under reg 6 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:52 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Bank of America v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 2:23 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and others [2009] UKSC 6; [2009] WLR (D) 341 "Charges levied by banks in respect of unauthorised overdrafts were part of a 'package' of services and consideration and their fairness was exempt from review under reg 6(2)(b) of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
In Richardson v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:05 am
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury Court of Appeal “Where, in civil proceedings in which a litigant’s rights to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights applied, irreducible minimum rights were required to be accorded the litigant to be given sufficient information of the evidential case against him, to enable him to give effective instructions concerning the essential allegations against him. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 7:23 am
On November 8, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:45 am
This was illustrated in Bridge v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 10:13 am
In Peng v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:48 pm
Yesterday SCOTUS released another important case involving the US Fair Housing Act: Bank of American Corp. et al v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:46 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Tuesday heard argument [day call, PDF] in the cases of Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:38 pm
On May 1, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
Clearing House Association [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the National Bank Act (NBA) [12 USC § 484(a) text] and 12 CFR § 7.4000 [text] do not prevent a state from enforcing fair lending laws against national banks. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:55 am
Platform Funding Ltd v Bank of Scotland plc (formerly Halifax plc) [2008] EWCA Civ 930; [2008] WLR (D) 283 “A surveyor, instructed by a mortgage lender to value the property offered by the borrower as security for a loan, who certified that the property had been inspected and a fair valuation given, was liable in damages to the mortgage lender for losses suffered as a result of having valued the wrong property in breach of an unqualified obligation to inspect the… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:40 am
Bank National Ass’n v. [read post]
